Havenâ€™t you heard?
Itâ€™s all about the word.
We have a need to read, to help our brainâ€™s exceed and lead.
Agreed? Proceed â€“ let your mind be freed. Just pick a book and take a look.
Imagination. An educational donation of narration elation.
Banned books are back in the news. And this time the villain is none other than the evil Dr. Suess.
This past March, a formal letter of complaint was filed with the Toronto Public Library, petitioning for the prompt expulsion of the gruesome and graphic missive promoting paternal harm all while masquerading as a light childrenâ€™s book.
Is this the dirty secret within â€œHop on Popâ€?
According to the complainant, The Simplest Seuss for Youngest Use Random House Beginner Book â€œencourages children to use violence against their fathers.â€ In addition to the demand for complete removal, the petition also requested the library â€œpay for damages resulting from the book.â€
We have now reached a point in society where we are so concerned with â€œprotectingâ€ our children and keeping them safe from any possible perceived danger that it actually is not terribly shocking to hear a tale of an attempt to ban one of the very books that teaches little ones how to read in the first place.
In an ironic reading comprehension failure, the actual stanza from the book reads,
HOP POP We like to hop.
We like to hop on top of Pop.
STOP You must not hop on Pop.
Words can hurt.
Youâ€™ve heard the old adage, about sticks and stones? Iâ€™ll clarify: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can slice through your heart and scar you.
This is, in fact, the very reason banning books is a dangerous and ill-advised practice.
As Albus Dumbledore reminded the boy wizard in the final tome of Harry Potter, â€œWords are, in my not so humble opinion, our most inexhaustible source of magic, capable of both inflicting injury and remedying it.â€
Words carry an inherent power. And the ability to comprehend and decipher both their literal and implicit meanings within them. Without the capacity to understand the cognitive difference between mission statements meant to incite, reflective poetry, fiction or fables, we then lose the humanity involved in debate and discussion.
Would I let my children read any book they wanted? Yes.
I believe that it my job as a parent to guide and educate my children so that they are capable of reading absolutely anything, but ensuring the supervision that they are also mature enough to handle content before they consume any given particular piece (and wise enough to instigate a discussion on any questions thusly arising).
Parents and schools are by far the most common challengers. The censorship of such pre-determined themes stifles progression and independent thought. All in all, the subjects covered are pretty systemic in any epic saga â€“ conflict is what drives the story forward.
According to analytics compiled by the American Library Association, the main reasons citing for censuring a book are: anti-ethnic, cultural sensitivity, racism, sexism, anti-family, nudity, offensive language, abortion, drugs/alcohol, gambling, gangs, violence, suicide, homosexuality, sexuality, political views, religious viewpoints, satanism, unsuited for an age group, and inaccuracies. All topics heavily played throughout all major religious texts spanning back to the introduction of written history.
Stories are what keep society moving. Critical thinking and common sense are what will keep us afloat.